Milart Grafica
 
   
(11) 2915-7141
(11) 2385-2021
(11) 4112-1888
 

Newsletter



Passe o mouse na imagem para zoom

  • Agenda Wire-o Luxo Capa Em Couro Sinttico Preta

Formato 145x200mm
Papel off set 63 gramas
2x2 cores
ndice telefnico
Planejamento para prximo ano
Mapa em papel couche 4x4 cores


 

Agenda Wire-o Luxo Capa Em Couro Sinttico Preta 283 LM
Avaliação dos clientes: ( 16 comentrios )
Marca:
Disponibilidade:



 


  • Descriçao do Produto
  • Comentários de Clientes
  • Video do Produto

Agenda Wire-o Luxo Capa Em Couro Sintético Preta

  • Formato 145x200mm
  • Papel off set 63 gramas
  • 2x2 cores
  • Índice telefônico
  • Planejamento para próximo ano
  • Mapa em papel couche 4x4 cores
Escreva seu prprio comentrio para o produto

Comentrios Enviados

Mostrando comentrios 1-10 de 16 | Prximo

  1. qMriuCXQl7

    Postado por Anderson em 23rd Jul 2013

    "CY西九門牽涉的關乎幾百億計的公眾利益 如真有問題 案情就會比唐唐在自己家裡違規建地牢攬攬女或煲呔貪小便宜坐遊艇坐private jet嚴重得多多聲了 " "如真有問題" was the key phase in your response. Even you adtitmed that the problem has not yet been identified and that no evidence was ever presented to show CY Leung acted in direct conflict of interests. So how do you justify the author's nothing of Guilty before proven Innocent which is what the print media and this author are essentially doing?And I've also noticed that you've skipped my comments regarding the pan-democratic camp accepting donations from Jimmy Lai, and them being on his yacht, why did the print media put so little effort in pushing the case for corruption for these people? Why has these donations and these events not being a subject of an corruption investigation?"明眼人都可以看得出本土狗仔隊本身不可能會突然 升呢 挖到咁多料 一定有大內高手feed料給香港記者"明眼人 argument is always the funny ones. Because one would have seen that NONE of those "scandals" hold that much destructive power without the print media making wild speculations and innuendos as if they were facts. Even Henry Tang's problem would not have been as big had he not lied about it in the first place. 明眼人 would've think of something more juicier and with a lot more evidence "樓上說什麽六七暴動不能怪罪于北京 那就肯定是大錯特錯" If you read carefully what I wrote you will see that it is... "And to blame 1967 SOLELY on Beijing" which suggested that I believe Beijing does hold responsibilities for 1967 but they should not be the only one. As you write "當然英殖政策有其不是之處" you've indirectly adtitmed that the author has made no mention of this, and therefore making his assertion that Beijing is the only one to blame incorrect."至於第一and第二段 練總更是在想著好心獻策 --- 不要把團派/胡錦濤/中聯辦/彭清華/工聯會等土共/個別垂涎香港利益的內資&其相連的港資二五仔 vs. 太子党/江澤民/港澳辦/廖暉/傳統滬藉唐姓田姓等工商世家+寶baby姓何鴻燊姓等省港澳世家/七八十年代冒起的龍頭地產霸權大族 之間的龍爭虎鬥把香港社會撕裂 "Name one time period in history of any society where the wealthiest don't get the advantages. Are you suggesting that there is no 霸權 during the 70s and 80s? No, what makes Hong Kong a mess today is people like you found it easier to get what you want by complaining instead of working. That government should be responsible for your success and shield you from failure. How is it that Hong Kongers back in the 60s and 70s had to deal with plague, and water shortages, no public housing or government assistant programs, but yet have fewer whiners than we have today!? http://gekoxurnqj.com [url=http://dxtlhwds.com]dxtlhwds[/url] [link=http://bqbfkdwz.com]bqbfkdwz[/link]


  2. qMriuCXQl7

    Postado por Anderson em 23rd Jul 2013

    "CY西九門牽涉的關乎幾百億計的公眾利益 如真有問題 案情就會比唐唐在自己家裡違規建地牢攬攬女或煲呔貪小便宜坐遊艇坐private jet嚴重得多多聲了 " "如真有問題" was the key phase in your response. Even you adtitmed that the problem has not yet been identified and that no evidence was ever presented to show CY Leung acted in direct conflict of interests. So how do you justify the author's nothing of Guilty before proven Innocent which is what the print media and this author are essentially doing?And I've also noticed that you've skipped my comments regarding the pan-democratic camp accepting donations from Jimmy Lai, and them being on his yacht, why did the print media put so little effort in pushing the case for corruption for these people? Why has these donations and these events not being a subject of an corruption investigation?"明眼人都可以看得出本土狗仔隊本身不可能會突然 升呢 挖到咁多料 一定有大內高手feed料給香港記者"明眼人 argument is always the funny ones. Because one would have seen that NONE of those "scandals" hold that much destructive power without the print media making wild speculations and innuendos as if they were facts. Even Henry Tang's problem would not have been as big had he not lied about it in the first place. 明眼人 would've think of something more juicier and with a lot more evidence "樓上說什麽六七暴動不能怪罪于北京 那就肯定是大錯特錯" If you read carefully what I wrote you will see that it is... "And to blame 1967 SOLELY on Beijing" which suggested that I believe Beijing does hold responsibilities for 1967 but they should not be the only one. As you write "當然英殖政策有其不是之處" you've indirectly adtitmed that the author has made no mention of this, and therefore making his assertion that Beijing is the only one to blame incorrect."至於第一and第二段 練總更是在想著好心獻策 --- 不要把團派/胡錦濤/中聯辦/彭清華/工聯會等土共/個別垂涎香港利益的內資&其相連的港資二五仔 vs. 太子党/江澤民/港澳辦/廖暉/傳統滬藉唐姓田姓等工商世家+寶baby姓何鴻燊姓等省港澳世家/七八十年代冒起的龍頭地產霸權大族 之間的龍爭虎鬥把香港社會撕裂 "Name one time period in history of any society where the wealthiest don't get the advantages. Are you suggesting that there is no 霸權 during the 70s and 80s? No, what makes Hong Kong a mess today is people like you found it easier to get what you want by complaining instead of working. That government should be responsible for your success and shield you from failure. How is it that Hong Kongers back in the 60s and 70s had to deal with plague, and water shortages, no public housing or government assistant programs, but yet have fewer whiners than we have today!? http://gekoxurnqj.com [url=http://dxtlhwds.com]dxtlhwds[/url] [link=http://bqbfkdwz.com]bqbfkdwz[/link]


  3. qMriuCXQl7

    Postado por Anderson em 23rd Jul 2013

    "CY西九門牽涉的關乎幾百億計的公眾利益 如真有問題 案情就會比唐唐在自己家裡違規建地牢攬攬女或煲呔貪小便宜坐遊艇坐private jet嚴重得多多聲了 " "如真有問題" was the key phase in your response. Even you adtitmed that the problem has not yet been identified and that no evidence was ever presented to show CY Leung acted in direct conflict of interests. So how do you justify the author's nothing of Guilty before proven Innocent which is what the print media and this author are essentially doing?And I've also noticed that you've skipped my comments regarding the pan-democratic camp accepting donations from Jimmy Lai, and them being on his yacht, why did the print media put so little effort in pushing the case for corruption for these people? Why has these donations and these events not being a subject of an corruption investigation?"明眼人都可以看得出本土狗仔隊本身不可能會突然 升呢 挖到咁多料 一定有大內高手feed料給香港記者"明眼人 argument is always the funny ones. Because one would have seen that NONE of those "scandals" hold that much destructive power without the print media making wild speculations and innuendos as if they were facts. Even Henry Tang's problem would not have been as big had he not lied about it in the first place. 明眼人 would've think of something more juicier and with a lot more evidence "樓上說什麽六七暴動不能怪罪于北京 那就肯定是大錯特錯" If you read carefully what I wrote you will see that it is... "And to blame 1967 SOLELY on Beijing" which suggested that I believe Beijing does hold responsibilities for 1967 but they should not be the only one. As you write "當然英殖政策有其不是之處" you've indirectly adtitmed that the author has made no mention of this, and therefore making his assertion that Beijing is the only one to blame incorrect."至於第一and第二段 練總更是在想著好心獻策 --- 不要把團派/胡錦濤/中聯辦/彭清華/工聯會等土共/個別垂涎香港利益的內資&其相連的港資二五仔 vs. 太子党/江澤民/港澳辦/廖暉/傳統滬藉唐姓田姓等工商世家+寶baby姓何鴻燊姓等省港澳世家/七八十年代冒起的龍頭地產霸權大族 之間的龍爭虎鬥把香港社會撕裂 "Name one time period in history of any society where the wealthiest don't get the advantages. Are you suggesting that there is no 霸權 during the 70s and 80s? No, what makes Hong Kong a mess today is people like you found it easier to get what you want by complaining instead of working. That government should be responsible for your success and shield you from failure. How is it that Hong Kongers back in the 60s and 70s had to deal with plague, and water shortages, no public housing or government assistant programs, but yet have fewer whiners than we have today!? http://gekoxurnqj.com [url=http://dxtlhwds.com]dxtlhwds[/url] [link=http://bqbfkdwz.com]bqbfkdwz[/link]


  4. TI6s2gwrkP

    Postado por Siti em 19th Jul 2013

    Well to all those fockers who<a href="http://whltpiam.com"> biveele</a> in DEMOCRACY, it serves them damn well right.DEMOCRACY is a suspect system - it is full of contradictions and "time-bombs". (to use a currently faddish term). Democracy is majority rule, whuch means if you can corrupt the majority, you WIN.Which is why I personally don't<a href="http://whltpiam.com"> biveele</a> in political democracy. The only place democracy should exist is the free market, but never in social institutions like religion and politics.Democracy purports to guarnatee freedom and fairness and justice for individuals and societies. It failed - spectacularly! (I enjoy watching anything spectacular).It has been shown, time and again, that democracy can be corrupted and the power of the people usurped, then swiftly turned against them in some form of tyrannical monster. Also, invariably some unsavoury character will be voted in by the "hypnotized" majority. Pick the lastest "surprise" of democracy - the election into power of HAMAS in Palestine. A bunch of brutal, violent Islamo-fascists who kill as "duty".Other historical examples: Hitler, Reagan, Nixon, Musollini, Mao... all shining examples of the expression of People Power. and they all "bought votes" by mesmerising the majority of their citizens, and turning their passion into political support. (dangerous shit!)The best way to corrupt the majority is to offer them "goodies" in terms of "something-for-nothing"... actually it is not merely "nothing" - they want your vote. So they buy it with the promise of goodies, anchored fast to some idea of "moral high ground", which gives validity and a sense of "nationalistic" purpose to their "social plans". Ahh... thus the xenophobia, bigotry and jingoism begins.An election gives everyone in the political realm, the opportunity to "write their own cheque". Leverage the people's "needs" - essentially based on their fears rooted in uncertainty, a sad lack of faith, and the inability to evaluate anything critically. In other words, too damn scared to stand up for oneself, so lets go for GROUP POWER - where we can "support each other", "identify with each other's common interests", "empathise with one's fellow man" - vomit, puke, chunder....eeeeeecchhhhhhh!So yeah man. Let the sheep be led to their slaughter. And may the slaughter be brutal, and slow!I wanna enjoy this one! :-)HAHAHAHHA...


  5. TI6s2gwrkP

    Postado por Siti em 19th Jul 2013

    Well to all those fockers who<a href="http://whltpiam.com"> biveele</a> in DEMOCRACY, it serves them damn well right.DEMOCRACY is a suspect system - it is full of contradictions and "time-bombs". (to use a currently faddish term). Democracy is majority rule, whuch means if you can corrupt the majority, you WIN.Which is why I personally don't<a href="http://whltpiam.com"> biveele</a> in political democracy. The only place democracy should exist is the free market, but never in social institutions like religion and politics.Democracy purports to guarnatee freedom and fairness and justice for individuals and societies. It failed - spectacularly! (I enjoy watching anything spectacular).It has been shown, time and again, that democracy can be corrupted and the power of the people usurped, then swiftly turned against them in some form of tyrannical monster. Also, invariably some unsavoury character will be voted in by the "hypnotized" majority. Pick the lastest "surprise" of democracy - the election into power of HAMAS in Palestine. A bunch of brutal, violent Islamo-fascists who kill as "duty".Other historical examples: Hitler, Reagan, Nixon, Musollini, Mao... all shining examples of the expression of People Power. and they all "bought votes" by mesmerising the majority of their citizens, and turning their passion into political support. (dangerous shit!)The best way to corrupt the majority is to offer them "goodies" in terms of "something-for-nothing"... actually it is not merely "nothing" - they want your vote. So they buy it with the promise of goodies, anchored fast to some idea of "moral high ground", which gives validity and a sense of "nationalistic" purpose to their "social plans". Ahh... thus the xenophobia, bigotry and jingoism begins.An election gives everyone in the political realm, the opportunity to "write their own cheque". Leverage the people's "needs" - essentially based on their fears rooted in uncertainty, a sad lack of faith, and the inability to evaluate anything critically. In other words, too damn scared to stand up for oneself, so lets go for GROUP POWER - where we can "support each other", "identify with each other's common interests", "empathise with one's fellow man" - vomit, puke, chunder....eeeeeecchhhhhhh!So yeah man. Let the sheep be led to their slaughter. And may the slaughter be brutal, and slow!I wanna enjoy this one! :-)HAHAHAHHA...


  6. TI6s2gwrkP

    Postado por Siti em 19th Jul 2013

    Well to all those fockers who<a href="http://whltpiam.com"> biveele</a> in DEMOCRACY, it serves them damn well right.DEMOCRACY is a suspect system - it is full of contradictions and "time-bombs". (to use a currently faddish term). Democracy is majority rule, whuch means if you can corrupt the majority, you WIN.Which is why I personally don't<a href="http://whltpiam.com"> biveele</a> in political democracy. The only place democracy should exist is the free market, but never in social institutions like religion and politics.Democracy purports to guarnatee freedom and fairness and justice for individuals and societies. It failed - spectacularly! (I enjoy watching anything spectacular).It has been shown, time and again, that democracy can be corrupted and the power of the people usurped, then swiftly turned against them in some form of tyrannical monster. Also, invariably some unsavoury character will be voted in by the "hypnotized" majority. Pick the lastest "surprise" of democracy - the election into power of HAMAS in Palestine. A bunch of brutal, violent Islamo-fascists who kill as "duty".Other historical examples: Hitler, Reagan, Nixon, Musollini, Mao... all shining examples of the expression of People Power. and they all "bought votes" by mesmerising the majority of their citizens, and turning their passion into political support. (dangerous shit!)The best way to corrupt the majority is to offer them "goodies" in terms of "something-for-nothing"... actually it is not merely "nothing" - they want your vote. So they buy it with the promise of goodies, anchored fast to some idea of "moral high ground", which gives validity and a sense of "nationalistic" purpose to their "social plans". Ahh... thus the xenophobia, bigotry and jingoism begins.An election gives everyone in the political realm, the opportunity to "write their own cheque". Leverage the people's "needs" - essentially based on their fears rooted in uncertainty, a sad lack of faith, and the inability to evaluate anything critically. In other words, too damn scared to stand up for oneself, so lets go for GROUP POWER - where we can "support each other", "identify with each other's common interests", "empathise with one's fellow man" - vomit, puke, chunder....eeeeeecchhhhhhh!So yeah man. Let the sheep be led to their slaughter. And may the slaughter be brutal, and slow!I wanna enjoy this one! :-)HAHAHAHHA...


  7. 3fVSaUx87

    Postado por Ken em 19th Jul 2013

    Anon,That's the wrong queitson. The queitson is whether I care to reach certain women or "change" things.I don't.The situation is not salvageable. It will collapse. I could be wrong, but that is my belief.Since that is my belief, and no amount of "cajoling" will make a difference, the primary reason I do this is one simple reason-Mockery.I want to laugh at these miserable people as they can't find out why their lives are so miserable. I want to see them suffer the price everybody else who tried to maintain and advance this society, had to fight them mindlessly destroying it.I want all the women who swallowed feminism whole to have salt rubbed in their wounds.I am done trying to convince them or "change them." That point is long past. It is now time to berate, mock, ridicule, and just plain mentally beat them to hell.At any time, any woman, at any age can see the lesson is still the same, the intent is completely different.And MAYBE if there's an actual cost of mockery and ridicule, they may think twice before becoming the next Sandra Fluke. http://wugmtlqvyzn.com [url=http://zkvmqasbn.com]zkvmqasbn[/url] [link=http://vfszzobgjv.com]vfszzobgjv[/link]


  8. 7OZeBWZPI83

    Postado por Praba em 19th Jul 2013

    One of my comments on Dr. Helen's site<a href="http://rpjrgy.com"> rnerfeeced</a> how modern womyn are NOT interested in marriage at all, UNTIL the time when both their 30th birthday and 'The Wall' are approaching. Of course, after spending the previous fifteen-plus years being 'free whores' and f*cktoys (and expending their looks and fertility) for the rich playboys and the 'exciting', 'romantic' thugs and criminals, they are worthless as wives at that point.It is both ironic and amusing that it is only then that they express any concern at all for the 'good men' that they crapped and spat on during that same time period...unless you know what their little game is. And more and more men ARE wising up as to exactly what their little game is...as can be seen in the lack of mens' interest in being some ex-carousel rider's Meal Ticket, ATM, and mule.They demanded 'equality'...so let them keep themselves warm at night snuggled up to their careers, and support the economy by having to work for the rest of their lives until they drop dead.Just like men have to.But I'll bet that isn't the kind of 'equality' that they wanted, don't you think?If there is any Justice, these hubric whores will catch 'Superbug' gonorrhea and lose the remainder of their looks and fertility.


  9. 7OZeBWZPI83

    Postado por Praba em 19th Jul 2013

    One of my comments on Dr. Helen's site<a href="http://rpjrgy.com"> rnerfeeced</a> how modern womyn are NOT interested in marriage at all, UNTIL the time when both their 30th birthday and 'The Wall' are approaching. Of course, after spending the previous fifteen-plus years being 'free whores' and f*cktoys (and expending their looks and fertility) for the rich playboys and the 'exciting', 'romantic' thugs and criminals, they are worthless as wives at that point.It is both ironic and amusing that it is only then that they express any concern at all for the 'good men' that they crapped and spat on during that same time period...unless you know what their little game is. And more and more men ARE wising up as to exactly what their little game is...as can be seen in the lack of mens' interest in being some ex-carousel rider's Meal Ticket, ATM, and mule.They demanded 'equality'...so let them keep themselves warm at night snuggled up to their careers, and support the economy by having to work for the rest of their lives until they drop dead.Just like men have to.But I'll bet that isn't the kind of 'equality' that they wanted, don't you think?If there is any Justice, these hubric whores will catch 'Superbug' gonorrhea and lose the remainder of their looks and fertility.


  10. 7OZeBWZPI83

    Postado por Praba em 19th Jul 2013

    One of my comments on Dr. Helen's site<a href="http://rpjrgy.com"> rnerfeeced</a> how modern womyn are NOT interested in marriage at all, UNTIL the time when both their 30th birthday and 'The Wall' are approaching. Of course, after spending the previous fifteen-plus years being 'free whores' and f*cktoys (and expending their looks and fertility) for the rich playboys and the 'exciting', 'romantic' thugs and criminals, they are worthless as wives at that point.It is both ironic and amusing that it is only then that they express any concern at all for the 'good men' that they crapped and spat on during that same time period...unless you know what their little game is. And more and more men ARE wising up as to exactly what their little game is...as can be seen in the lack of mens' interest in being some ex-carousel rider's Meal Ticket, ATM, and mule.They demanded 'equality'...so let them keep themselves warm at night snuggled up to their careers, and support the economy by having to work for the rest of their lives until they drop dead.Just like men have to.But I'll bet that isn't the kind of 'equality' that they wanted, don't you think?If there is any Justice, these hubric whores will catch 'Superbug' gonorrhea and lose the remainder of their looks and fertility.


Mostrando comentrios 1-10 de 16 | Prximo




 
   
 
 
Milart Grafica
Rua Gonçalves Ledo, 680,
Ipiranga, São Paulo - SP
(11)2915-7141
[email protected]